Skip to content
FreshStream

The Venezuelan Crisis Could Now Determine President Trump's Legacy - as well as the United States' Role in the Global Order

In the wake of launching a evening of overwhelming force in Venezuela, Donald Trump now appears to be entering the state-building arena.

In a remarkable news conference at his Mar-a-Lago resort on Saturday morning, the commander-in-chief declared that US military forces had effectively captured Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro and his wife in an overnight raid in Caracas.

Trump then said that a group including Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Secretary of Defence Pete Hegseth, working with Venezuelans, would be taking control of the embattled nation.

"We are going to administer the country until such time as we can do a safe, proper and judicious transition," he said.

What precisely "managing the nation" actually means is ambiguous, but the commitment marks an sudden change of course for the president, rife with contradictions and significant obstacles.

A president who ran on opposing "endless conflicts", who vehemently denounced past US attempts at overthrowing governments and who vowed to implement an "America First" foreign policy is now betting his administration on effectively reconstructing a South American nation whose economy is collapsed and whose political stability has been eroded by years of dictatorship.

Yet, Trump was persistently optimistic.

He claimed his administration has a "perfect track record of winning" – and that this would be no different. He vowed to enlist American oil firms to overhaul Venezuela's crumbling production infrastructure, supplying financing for the American reconstruction efforts and aiding the Venezuelan people.

He declined to rule out deploying American soldiers to Venezuela to advance these efforts. "We're not afraid of boots on the ground…we had boots on the ground last night," he told reporters.

Trump, a sharp critic of the US intervention of Iraq, will now have to remember the words of one of the American architects of the Iraq War, Secretary of State Colin Powell: "If you break it, you own it."

An Altered International Stance

The US has redefined Venezuela's destiny – whether for good or ill.

Trump entered office nearly a year ago pledging to be a peacemaker, but over the past year he has proven that he is ready to use armed force internationally.

In the past week, he ordered airstrikes on Syria and Nigeria. In 2025, he targeted atomic sites in Iran, alleged drug-trafficking boats in the Caribbean, insurgent groups in Yemen, armed groups in Somalia and Islamic militants in Iraq.

Unlike previous operations, which have mostly involved rockets and warplanes that minimize the risk of American forces to harm, Trump's Venezuela strike – and his pledges to the future of that nation – are strikingly distinct.

His aim, he said during his press conference, is to "restore Venezuela's greatness."

Reactions from Allies and Critics

That variation of Trump's "Make America Great Again" – or Maga - mantra might prove difficult for some of Trump's supporters to accept.

Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene, a one-time Trump loyalist who broke with the president after accusing him of deserting his political base, was quick to criticize the president's actions on social media.

"Americans' disgust with our own government's never ending military aggression and support of overseas conflicts is understandable because we are forced to pay for it," she stated. "This is what many in Maga thought they voted to end. How mistaken we were."

Another notable Trump detractor, Republican Congressman Thomas Massie, contrasted the legal justification for Maduro's arrest – on arms and drug trafficking charges – with Trump's reasoning that the operation was to retake confiscated US oil and halt fentanyl production.

The majority of Republican lawmakers rallied behind the president, with House Speaker Mike Johnson characterizing the military action against a "illegitimate government" as "firm and legitimate".

Policy Rationales and Worldwide Consequences

During his appearance, the president said the Venezuelan operation advanced his "America First" agenda because it ensured US hemispheric security and provided a reliable source of oil.

He resurrected the Monroe Doctrine – an early 19th Century American diplomatic policy that asserted the Western Hemisphere should be without influence by European powers – and rebranded it the "Donroe Doctrine."

The move in Venezuela, Trump said, shows that "American dominance in the Western Hemisphere will never be questioned again."

The purpose of the new US national security strategy, he said, was to "protect commerce, territory and resources that are central to our national security." He branded the Western Hemisphere as America's "backyard."

Trump's choice to apprehend Maduro will provoke broader questions in international relations, however, and impact American relations with the world's other significant military powers.

The Chinese government released a statement voicing shock and denouncing what it said was a irresponsible assault on a sovereign nation.

During the Biden administration, the US offered comparable censures of Russia after its invasion of Ukraine. Now the Trump administration is attempting to broker a ceasefire between those two nations – one that has frequently appeared to be leaning to the Russian side.

Don Bacon, a moderate Republican congressman, voiced concern about the precedent Trump's actions might send.

"My primary concern is now Russia will use this to excuse their unlawful and brutal operations against Ukraine, or China to rationalize an attack of Taiwan."

Opposition and Legal Scrutiny

Trump's Democratic critics were blunter.

"The United States should not be running other countries for any reason," said a senator who serves on the Senate Foreign Relations committee. "We should have understood by now not to get involved in perpetual conflicts and regime change missions that carry devastating consequences for Americans."

Another senior Democratic lawmaker said Maduro is a criminal and a dictator with a record of rights violations. But he censured Trump's decision not to consult with congressional leaders prior to launching the attack.

"The President has the constitutional responsibility to abide by the law and uphold institutional norms in the United States," he said. "That is what placing America First demands."

Trump, in his remarks, explained that he chose not to inform Congress because he was worried they would "leak" particulars of the operation prior to the attack.

A Path Forward Shrouded in Doubt

That military operation was a triumph – with no American casualties and minimal harm to US equipment. Trump, with his characteristic confidence, described the operation as a "spectacular assault" and "among the most stunning, effective and powerful demonstrations of American military might and proficiency in American history."

Now he is staking his legacy on that victory enduring, as the US says it will assume responsibility for running and rebuilding Venezuela - though what that actually means remains unclear. He and his administration must strengthen a nation that has been in turmoil for years while calming a region that is bound to be apprehensive of what Trump's foreign policy has planned for them.

About the author

James Martin

Maya Chen is a lifestyle writer and digital content creator with a passion for exploring modern trends and sharing practical insights.

FreshStream

Type to search articles.